My apologies if someone has already answered this question elsewhere but were there no reductions in series three? 
The original thread has been “archived” and so I am unable to attach the quotes directly from it.
However, I hope the following helps. If you wish to go to:
“Archive/off topic”, then to Page 470 and read:
Reply #7035
Reply #7038
Reply #7040
This – I believe - gives the state of affairs so far.
A Comment In PassingYou will note – as I did - that the above postings are not in consecutive order. This is worrying because it
MAY suggest that the archiving process does not produce what an archive should be.
I sincerely hope I stand to be corrected but I have an uneasy feeling that, while postings are “preserved”, much of their meaning is lost because rather than maintaining postings within their conversations/threads, they appear to be simply saved in posting date/time order; if so, it will not be possible to be certain which conversation/thread they relate to. In other words, the archive may be no more than a list of postings which may or may not be related to those which precede or follow them.
If this is the case, then it is very upsetting.
Tony Essex left us such a treasure but also a terrible burden – so much was left unsaid and left undone. Much of what we have come to understand about Follyfoot really derives from conversations over the years between members – their experiences, observations, analyses, insights and conclusions. At some point the Forum could/should become the source of EVERYTHING THAT WILL EVER BE KNOWN about Follyfoot.
Instead, accumulated understanding may inadvertently be being lost only for the same questions to be asked by new members of recent members who cannot unscramble a semi-jumble of postings to draw upon the knowledge of earlier members that have long since left the Forum.
